Below is a chronology of COVID-19 infection in the Australian Defence Force, indicating when each new case was added to Defence’s running total of cases.
Initially, Defence seemed happy to give some reportable detail of the infections saying of the first two cases that,”having tested positive to COVID-19, the members have been isolated and efforts to trace any contacts the members had are focussed on the two officers travelling to a meeting at Defence Headquarters, Russell, ACT on 28 February 2020″.
In reporting the third case, Defence simply added ‘1’ to their running total and a dot on their map indicating where the case was geographically located, but giving no other details (not even the town name the dot represented, which became an issue of confusion as time went on).
Nil information was to become the new norm – leaving CONTACT to pull together what relevant other information we could, just to ‘pad out’ our reports – or add our own (mostly cranky) editorial postulating.
EDITOR’S NOTE: We felt compelled to report Defence COVID-19 ‘news’ to our military-focused audience – not just news of disease spread, but also of what Defence was contributing to the whole-of-government fight against the virus.
Our audience proved to be very engaged and information-hungry. Almost every post we made about COVID-19 was read significantly more than most other everyday news stories on our web site – and one in particular went viral.
While CONTACT is a ‘Defence friendly’ media outlet, there are others who aren’t. And if CONTACT has to ‘pad out’ stories in an information vacuum, we dread to think what other media will write about Defence, either during the crisis (when information vacuums are counterproductive – PR101?) or in the wash-up.
Below is a chronology of when cases were added by Defence.
Because Defence simply added numbers to a running total on a daily basis, to the same web page, this chronology and extra detail was lost on the Defence web site. We hope it may be useful to others. We know it will be useful for our own historical referencing.
Where entries have no hyperlink, Defence added a fresh update before we got around to publishing the earlier one.
Aside from these confirmed-infection case additions, other stories and information were also added. You can find all our COVID-19 coverage here.
4 April (1.30pm): Defence adds 30th case – ACT
4 April (9am): Defence adds 29th case – Melbourne
3 April (12.30pm): Defence adds 28th case – Adelaide
2 April (11am): Defence adds 27th case – 1st case in Darwin
1 April (1.30pm): Defence adds 26th case – Adelaide
31 March (9am): Defence adds 25th case – ACT
30 March (2pm): Defence adds 24th case – Brisbane (also, the Oakey(?) case was moved to Brisbane)
30 March (11.30am): Defence adds 23rd case – Brisbane
29 March (5pm): Defence adds 22nd case – west of Brisbane (Oakey perhaps?)
28 March (noon): Defence adds 21st case – Melbourne
28 March (9am): Defence adds 20th case – Sydney
27 March (9pm): Defence adds 19th case – Sydney
27 March (5pm): Defence adds 17th and 18th cases – ACT
26 March (4pm): Defence adds 16th case – Newcastle (?)
26 March (2pm): Defence adds 15th case – Adelaide
25 March (4pm): Defence adds 13th and 14th cases – Adelaide and a new dot which is likely Newcastle.
25 March (11am): Defence adds 12th case – Sydney
24 March: Defence adds 10th and 11th cases Only at this stage did we realise the importance of the daily map. At this stage, the cases were spread – 5 in Sydney, 2 in Adelaide, and 1 each in Brisbane, ACT, Melbourne and what we now think was Jervis Bay.
23 March: Defence adds 8th and 9th cases
22 March: Defence adds 7th case
21 March: Defence adds 6th case
14 March: Defence adds 5th case
13 March: Australian Submarine Corporation reports first case, in detail
11 March: Defence adds 4th case
10 March: Defence adds 3rd case giving no details in what was to become their new norm. This third case was also indicated on Defence’s map as being in Sydney.
9 March: First two Defence cases reported with contact-tracing details. The pair had travelled to Sydney for meetings, but were managed in Sydney.
. . .