A Lesson in Artificial Intelligence

“Artificial intelligence (AI) is technology that enables computers and machines to simulate human learning, comprehension, problem solving, decision making, creativity and autonomy.”

The Google search engine is one of the systems which uses these processes. The following example illustrates one of the shortcomings of reliance on it to generate solutions to complex problems.

By accident, the following was ‘Googled’: “What Would Be the ‘Right Thing’ for the Chief of Army to do About 1 Armd Regt?”, which has been the theme of recent letters published in CONTACT.

The response below is that provided by Google…

 

 

The “right thing” for the Chief of Army to do regarding 1 Armd Regt is to acknowledge the mistake and implement a plan to address the issue without further damage to the unit’s morale or its combat readiness.

This involves either reintegrating the regiment into a combat role or finding a suitable alternative role that allows it to maintain its identity and traditions, while also fulfilling the needs of the Army.

Here’s a breakdown of the “right thing” and why:

Addressing the “Mistake” and Avoiding Further Damage

Acknowledge the oversight. The decision to re-role 1 Armd Regt as a non-combatant unit, particularly its detachment from a combat role, has been widely criticized and viewed as a mistake. Acknowledging this is the first step in repairing the damage.

Reintegrate into a combat role. The most logical and morale-boosting solution would be to re-establish 1 Armd Regt as a tank regiment, potentially commanding tank squadrons in Townsville or other strategic locations.

Alternative role within a combat framework. If reintegration into a traditional tank role isn’t feasible, the regiment could be given a role that maintains its combat capabilities, such as a specialized reconnaissance or combined arms unit.

Maintaining Morale and Traditions.

Recognize the value of 1 Armd Regt. 1 Armd Regt is the oldest and most decorated regular army unit in the Royal Australian Armoured Corps (RAAC). Its history, traditions, and esprit de corps are valuable assets that should be preserved.

Consider the impact on soldiers and veterans. The decision to re-role 1 Armd Regt has had a significant impact on the morale and careers of its soldiers and veterans. Any solution should consider these impacts and minimize any further negative effects.

Maintain the unit’s identity. The unit should not be disbanded or renamed to something less appropriate. Its identity and traditions should be maintained, even if its specific combat role changes.

Ethical Considerations.

Transparency and open communication. The decision to re-role 1 Armd Regt was made behind closed doors, which has further exacerbated the problem. A more transparent and open communication process in the future is essential.

Consultation with veterans and other stakeholders. The views of soldiers, veterans, and other stakeholders should be sought and considered in any decision-making process related to 1 Armd Regt.

Why the “Right Thing” is Important

Morale. The current situation has caused a significant decline in morale within the unit and the broader Army community. Addressing the issue is crucial for restoring morale.
Combat readiness. The decision to re-role 1 Armd Regt as a non-combatant unit may have negatively impacted the Army’s overall combat readiness. Reintegrating the regiment into a combat role or finding an alternative role that maintains its combat capabilities is crucial.

Public trust. The current situation has raised questions about the transparency and effectiveness of the Defence Strategic Review (DSR) process. Addressing the issue with transparency and open communication is essential for maintaining public trust.

In conclusion … the Chief of Army should take a proactive and decisive approach to address the situation surrounding 1 Armd Regt. This includes acknowledging the mistake, re-integrating the regiment into a combat role or finding a suitable alternative, maintaining the unit’s morale and traditions, and engaging in transparent and open communication.

While the outcome agrees entirely with the view of former members of 1 Armd Regt, the failure of AI in this example is that the only data on which the ‘reasoning’ was based, was that provided in articles written by them for CONTACT.

So, no counter arguments were taken into account. As the saying goes … one-sided information in, on-sided information out.

Nobody’s saying that it’s not good guidance for the Chief, however.

Lieutenant Colonel Bruce Cameron, MC, RAAC (Ret’d)

 

Image generated by ChatGPT

.

.


.


.